In my broking days I remember an old dealer who loved charts. With a chart in his hand this old sage of the market could render hours of painstaking fundamental research meaningless. “It’s a typical head and shoulders pattern,” "The 11 day moving average has crossed the 30 day, it’s a buy!” “It’s fallen through support levels, this thing is tanking!” In the world of Institutional equities research technical analysts are usually scoffed at… and for good reason – they often get in wrong, although funnily enough in hindsight they are always right.
The thing is fundamental analysts often get it wrong as well, I remember being told early on in my days that if you get more calls right than wrong you’re doing well. So which is better? Well it depends, you could point to a fundamental analyst such as Warren Buffet and say – there is a guy who got it right more times than he got it wrong and he’s probably the most successful investor of all time. But what if you’re not an investor? What if you are… that’s right I’m going to use that dirty word, a “trader?” Successful traders know that being right isn’t the most important part of making money. In fact a lot of successful traders get it wrong more often than they get it right but still make money. Why? Because they cut their losses quickly and let their profits run. They don’t need to be right even half the time to make money.
I’m an investor and I don’t pay too much attention to charts, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with technical analysis I just stick to what I know best and that’s researching company fundamentals. Bollinger bands, MACD, Candlestick charts, resistance and support levels, Relative strength, On balance volume it’s all interesting stuff, however don’t get carried away trying to find the holy grail of technical indicators that’s going to be right 100% of the time. If you do chances are you’ll be very disappointed just as you will be if you blindly follow the calls of fundamental research analysts.
Now that I remember that old sage – he was a wealthy guy, owned several pubs in the Sydney CBD a couple of houses and drove a Benz. Right I’m off to see if I can find my old SIA notes on technical indicators.
Monday, 11 December 2006
Fundamental Analysis vs Technical Analysis
Posted by The Fundamental Analyst 2 comments
Labels: Markets
Friday, 8 December 2006
My Portfolio: 1 month return
It's been 1 month since I began investing again. Above is a summary of the position of my portfolio after 1 month. A respectable 4.9% return after transaction costs driven by the strong performance of PWK. I'll post more information on the companies in my portfolio and the rationale for their inclusion at a later date.
Posted by The Fundamental Analyst 0 comments
Labels: My Portfolio
Thursday, 7 December 2006
From out of the wilderness
It's been more than 5 years since I bought a stock on the ASX and a little over 4 years since I've owned one. A lot has happened since then, the All Ords has nearly doubled and resource stocks that noone would touch with a barge poll are now flavour of the month, needless to say I'm still playing catch up. Unlike the tech boom commodity price fundamentals are well supported... or are they? Is the strong demand for commodities from China enough to offset a downturn in the US economy? Is the housing market falling off a cliff? Will the RBA raise interest rates again in 2007? Who knows? I certainly don't but it won't stop me from adding my two cents. I'll also pit my talents against the market and put on public display my own share portfolio so you can track my success or lack of it. Could be interesting...then again it could be really dull, drop in from time to time if you get bored and feel free to contribute.
Posted by The Fundamental Analyst 0 comments